Okay. Political stories and rants are officially back “on the table.”
Last night on 60 Minutes, former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill described George W. Bush as “a blind man in a roomful of deaf people” during Cabinet meetings, and revealed that within days of his inauguration, Mr. Bush planned to use U.S. troops to invade Iraq.
Of course, this means that, three years after he was sworn in, when Mr. Bush told us that Iraq was “a grave and gathering danger” (either because of those non-existent WMDs, or the equally non-existent ties to terrorists) he was doing nothing more than trying to fool We, The People, into going along with his inauguration-day plans to have his war on Iraq.
That information should enrage all Americans. The fact is, the Bush administration played us for suckers. In the aftermath of 9/11, when he could have actually been “a uniter, not a divider,” George W. Bush took our grief, outrage, and fear and exploited it.
And now, as the lies for war unravel, George W. Bush — the “compassionate conservative” — shows us where his priorities truly lie.
It took 74 days for the Bush Administration to begin an investigation into the leaking of Valerie Plame’s identity to Robert Novak. It’s very clear that the purpose of the leak was to intimidate former Ambassador Joe Wilson, and send a warning to anyone else who would dare speak the truth about the Bush Administration’s lies.
For those readers who aren’t familiar with her, Valerie Plame’s extremely undercover work for the CIA focused on tracking down weapons of mass destruction, and ensuring that they didn’t find their way into the hands of terrorists.
Gosh, that sure sounds familiar . . . isn’t tracking down weapons of mass destruction, and ensuring that they don’t find their way into the hands of terrorists the reason over 500 American soldiers and countless Iraqi civillians have lost their lives in the last 10 months? (They’ve changed the reason for invading Iraq so many times, I’ve lost track. If it’s a different reason today, if we’re back to “liberating the Iraqi people,” or “He took a shot at my daddy,” just wait. I’m sure they’ll return to “WMDs and Terrorists!” soon enough.)
See, whoever blew Ms. Plame’s cover actually increased the danger to Americans from terrorists with WMDs. Thank god we have that color-coded alert system to keep us distracted safe! Good thing we all know to watch out for dangerous people reading The Old Farmer’s Almanac, and six year-old girls boarding airplanes!
But here’s the thing that just boggles me, and actually moved me to write tonight: The Bush administration waited 74 days before they started an investigation into who blew Ms. Plame’s cover, putting her, all her assets, and all of us at risk.
Seventy-four days. When National Security is at stake.
How many days did it take for the Bush administration to call for an investigation into Paul O’Neill?
One. One day after he was on 60 Minutes. One day is all it took for what can be called a punitive investigation, at best, when all that’s really at stake is the rapidly vanishing ability of the Bush White house to lie to us and get away with it.
So the question sweeping the nation is: Does Mr. Bush care more about protecting Americans from terrorism and ensuring our safety, or protecting himself from criticism, and ensuring his reelection?
Well, I think that’s asked and answered, and I’m counting down to November.
(We’re still having some upgrade issues. Hopefully, comments will return by the end of the week)
UPDATE: Until comments are up and running again, I thought I would share some e-mails that I’ve read regarding this post: