Skip to content
WIL WHEATON dot NET WIL WHEATON dot NET

50,000 Monkeys at 50,000 Typewriters Can't Be Wrong

  • About
  • Books
  • My Instagram Feed
  • Bluesky
  • Tumblr
  • Radio Free Burrito
  • It’s Storytime with Wil Wheaton
WIL WHEATON dot NET
WIL WHEATON dot NET

50,000 Monkeys at 50,000 Typewriters Can't Be Wrong

reel around the fountain

Posted on 31 March, 2004 By Wil

A week or so ago, I did an interview with Developershed about WWdN, Dancing Barefoot, D&D, Nethack, and Sammy Hagar vs. David Lee Roth.
It just hit the web this morning, in their magazine called Plugin.
I’m very happy with the way the interview ended up, and the graphic design of of the piece is fantastic. There are lots of nifty pictures in there that made me feel sort of cool for 25 seconds.
Warning: when you read it, you will discover that, like, when I talk, it’s, like, really clear that I’m all, like, from the San Fernando Valley and stuff. Sorry about that.

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Discover more from WIL WHEATON dot NET

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Uncategorized

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Comments (61)

Comments navigation

Newer comments
  1. Rich says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:13 am

    W00t! First post!
    This is Rich, from DeveloperShed. It was great doing the interview with you, and I can tell you that all of us (well, some of us anyways) have taken to reading your blog on a (semi) regular basis.

  2. Jon Caputo says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:14 am

    Wil
    Thanks for doing the interview with us! We had a blast writing it up and Im glad you liked the way it turned out. We are already getting rave reviews from the folks over at OReilly!
    I hope your book continues to do fantastically!

  3. geoster says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:14 am

    Great interview, Wil. Way to go!

  4. HJ says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:24 am

    LOVE The “Smiths” refrences
    Cool interview

  5. Rob says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:35 am

    Wil, I think you have reached “critical mass.” I predict that after your book [JAG] comes out virtually everyone in the western part of the country will have one or two degrees of separation from you with the rest of the country not far behind! Enjoyed the interview.

  6. gnorb says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:39 am

    Seeing as I was the editor in charge of putting the interview to print (thereby revealing the apparently valley-girl-like speech patterns of Wil), I feel that I should comment on the interview.
    It was fun. It was cool. (But what else would one expect?)
    And on to related matters…
    Regarding the speech itself, after transcribing the interview (which had been recorded), I found myself noticing my own speech patterns. Much to my chagrin, I found that I tend to stutter, mumble, and use the words “like” and “uhm” and inordinate amount of times. (No wonder my co-workers are constantly telling me to slow down when I speak. Or talk louder. Or repeat what I was saying. Or enunciate. Aw, hell. I should just post stickies on my forehead and let people read them!) Like you, I’m glad that this doesn’t show up in my writing.
    Nevertheless, like all here, I enjoyed being part of this interview and wish all the best to you in future endeavors. As Rich mentioned, some of us have taken to reading your blog on a pretty regular basis, if we weren’t already checking it out once in a while before. 😉

  7. stoolpigeon says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:46 am

    That interview was cool and for the folks that wrote it- I’ve never heard of your mag before but I’ll be checking it all out- so this gets you a new reader. But the coolest thing– the Secret of Nimh pic. I mean it’s all about the NIMH! I’m so glad to see it got some props. Don Bluth is the man.

  8. stoolpigeon says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:50 am

    Hey sorry to post again and sorry if this is too off topic but the BSA add in the mag has me crackin’ up. It’s not the same as the first time I saw an MS ad on /. but close- if any of you devshed folks are still around I just wanted to thank you for that bit of humor in my day. sorry.

  9. Malachesque says:
    31 March, 2004 at 10:59 am

    Great interview! I especially liked the part where you talked about the facets of your life, how we only read about a small percentage of who you are.
    The way you write about your life is so open and honest, it just doesn’t occur to me that you hold anything back. I’ve noticed that this sort of editing is hard to do with any subtlety… with most blogs or autobiographies, it’s obvious when a person skips things over.
    Y’know, I sometimes have to remind myself that you’re *that* Wil Wheaton, that you’re an actor and not just this cool guy with a nifty blog.
    🙂

  10. Lynn says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:00 am

    It’s all about the accent, dude. Even if they ah wicked hahd ta undastaynd.
    New Englander and proud.

  11. Abby says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:07 am

    More awesome awesome-ness. And hey…in case you didn’t know, a picture with you in it from SBM was on Ellen this morning because Jerry O’Connell was on. Primetime exposure…okay, not really. But I thought it was cool. With all this good stuff happening, I think you deserve a cupcake party. Blue icing all around!

  12. Patty says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:18 am

    That’s one wicked interview, dude.

  13. Jenny says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:19 am

    Awesome interview. And you’re right they did a good job with the pictures.

  14. Jodi says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:34 am

    oh, I meant to tell you something.
    I’ve talked about your website to co-workers a long time ago right about the time you got the soapbox, most of whom are not regular internet users. They don’t play video games and some of them actually still use ANTENNA’s to get t.v. reception in a bid to beat the cable company at their own game… I say go ahead more bandwidth for me.
    reeling myself back in to what I was going to tell you. Despite all the recent happenings in your life – I’ve sort of become only the occasional reader myself so I know I haven’t mentioned you in a while.
    At least twice a month someone mentions you, because they think they saw you on T.V. or somewhere. So they are looking out for you, and that’s got to be neat.

  15. Carrie says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:36 am

    Awesome interview, Wil. Of course, anything that features a slam at Shatner makes me smile… And how did I not know that you were the voice of Martin in NIMH? One of the my all-time fave cartoons–I even broke down and bought it on DVD.
    Anyway, it was, like, a great read. 🙂

  16. Pablo says:
    31 March, 2004 at 11:48 am

    Great interview.
    Linguistically could be worse, you could be from up here. “Like how’s it goin’ eh. RUSH rules” lol
    Anyway, ride the wave Wil. Enjoy your time in the sun. Here’s hoping it’s a long and sunny day.
    Cheers,
    Pablo

  17. Craig Steffen says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:04 pm

    Very neat interview–very genuine. I agree, I think the photo layout was cool. I think it’s awesome that they used the pic with you and Goofy.
    I wouldn’t worry about the “like” speech tic. It only shows up a couple of times in the interview. And it doesn’t mark you as someone from the Southern California or anywhere else; that’s pretty common all across the country.
    Love the books–rock on!

  18. AT says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:06 pm

    Great interview, and fantastic layout in the magazine! Way to go!
    -AT

  19. Wayne Ligon says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:18 pm

    Great interview! Yeah, I’m impressed that you have a 2E book within reach, as well. 🙂

  20. synchronicity says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:31 pm

    I haven’t had a chance to read the whole interview yet (I’m too busy), but it looks like the best one I’ve read with you. It’s both interesting and you come off as being open. I can relate to some of the regret and angst you express, but of course my circumstances are entirely different.

  21. synchronicity says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:33 pm

    I mean, “the best interview with you I’ve read”. Eeek, excuse my grammar.

  22. Kroeme says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:37 pm

    From one (former) Valley Boy to another, like, congrats, dude.

  23. Jessie says:
    31 March, 2004 at 12:40 pm

    Great interview. It was a nice read while I was at work. I just had a very stressful day of waiting to ask my boss for a raise. I finally went in and did it and he said he’d have to think about it and to come back in a month! (There’s a much longer story to this, but I won’t bore you.)The point is, when I came back out to my desk and checked your site I was very happy to see that you had updated it so that I had something to read and cheer me up. So, even though it’s not for me, thanks!

  24. Anonymous says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    I had a witty comment about your using the f-bomb. I had a comment about your being a bard, and one about wesley. They all sucked. How is it you manage to write stuff?
    Greatness. that’s how.

  25. Anonymous says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    I had a witty comment about your using the f-bomb. I had a comment about your being a bard, and one about wesley. They all sucked. How is it you manage to write stuff?
    Greatness. that’s how.

  26. Little_Kenny says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:18 pm

    Thanks for pointing out the article. I enjoyed reading the interview. Thanks Wil.

  27. ionicus says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:24 pm

    Does it make me some kind of creepy stalker if I could imagine *exactly* what you sounded like saying all the stuff in that interview? Or does it just mean you have a memorable and well-honed voice?
    🙂

  28. Classics_cat says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:32 pm

    I have to say, I’ve been reading your blog for a little while now (woo, LJ feeds!), and I’m consistently impressed by the quality of your prose. I’ve had a soft spot for you-the-actor for longer than you’d probably like to know, as a result of ST:TNG and other things, but I am quite impressed by you-the-writer, and I look forward to continuing to read your blog and your books. I really enjoyed the interview.
    *trying to avoid sounding like an idiot, because no one likes a 28yo fangirl*

  29. Miss Kitty Fantastico says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:53 pm

    Wil,
    Awesome interview!
    As a hopeful adaptee of Southern Cali ways.. I salute you! (the kitty coming fall of 2005)
    I really enjoyed your reflections on people aproaching you. I’ve worked the local fan run Con for years, have friends on reality tv shows, but seeing it from the other side is revealing, and I thank you.
    -MKF

  30. Bill says:
    31 March, 2004 at 2:13 pm

    Wil, you are SO Valley. And you Californicans make fun of the way we Texicans talk!
    I sure enjoyed reading that interview. And now I have another e-zine to keep up with because Plugin Mag had some other good articles too. Fortunately I like to read.
    But you know what, Wil? If you take any more blog breaks that distract you from achieving your April 2nd manuscript deadline, you deserve a spanking. Or no dessert or something. Maybe a visit from WFS will straighten you out properly. (SHUDDER!)
    We (WWdN fans and readers) will be watching closely, so we better not see any new posts until after Friday or… or… something.
    Good luck with all that – WW fans everywhere await the forthcoming book with bated breath. Or bad breath or bait or something.
    Thanks for entertaining us.
    Bill

  31. phriedom says:
    31 March, 2004 at 2:24 pm

    I got the reference for the last 5 post titles in a row and I feel cool again. I was starting to feel uncool because I didn’t get any of the Pixies references. But when you’re lame enough to let your self-image be influenced by pop-culture references, you have to ride the ups and downs.

  32. Tara says:
    31 March, 2004 at 2:50 pm

    Wil,
    You make me smile.
    Tara 🙂

  33. Jon says:
    31 March, 2004 at 2:52 pm

    Wesley so does NOT have a 25 AC! I’m sorry but I’m just not buying it. Assuming he’s attacked by a Klingon warrior (Fighter) with +1 BAB per level, the Klingon would need to be 6th Level (+6 BAB) on a roll of 19 to hit him with a regular weapon (20 always hits, 1 always misses). Just not right. 😉
    18 INT? Definitely. High wisdom? Not sure about that one. His character was all about learning and growing. Sure he had the book smarts but not the life smarts.
    Ok, I am I going to get a life now. 🙂

  34. Scott Van Essen says:
    31 March, 2004 at 2:54 pm

    Great interview.
    As usual, you da man.
    keep it up. I think you’re the luckiest guy around.

  35. wil says:
    31 March, 2004 at 3:12 pm

    Wesley’s AC is so high because he can stop time, but it’s probably a feat, and it would certainly have to be part of a prestige class character.
    I’m pretty sure stopping time would limit attacks of opportunity, too.
    /nerd

  36. Karen says:
    31 March, 2004 at 3:56 pm

    Loved the interview. I especially loved this line – “And with the exception of George (Takei), they were all really unhappy” – because I think it is very true. At the last Expo here in T-town, it only took about an hour to get autographs from Nimoy and Shatner because we weren’t allowed to speak to them. However, the next day with George Takei, it took almost 3 hours to get to the front of the line, because George took such obvious pleasure in greeting everybody that came through. There’s a lesson there, I think.

  37. C-DUB says:
    31 March, 2004 at 4:00 pm

    Lemmy!! \m/
    A fantastic read Wil. Good job!

  38. julie reppert says:
    31 March, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    why cant i read this? i try to DL it but it goes to a blank page. i sad

  39. Lawless1 says:
    31 March, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    Awesome interview Wil! For the record, I prefer Sammy, my kids are about 10 years younger than yours and I’m a Republican so I guess that makes me one of those parents you hate to sit next to at your kid’s sporting events…LOL Love ya anyway, hon, keep up the good work.

  40. shanmc says:
    31 March, 2004 at 4:11 pm

    Wil, you like completely, totally, supercalifragilistically ROCK!!!! That interview was great. I’ve been a reader for a short time now (6 months…short compared to a lot of you out there) and I am so excited for you. The interview was great and it just seems like so much is falling in to place for you with your work. Whenever I tell anyone about your blog now it goes like this: “go check out this kick ass site, this is what it’s like, this is what he believes in, etc etc…..oh and by the way, it’s http://www.wilwheaton.net…yes that Wil Wheatons, yes he was in some movies, BUT he’s a writer now and he’s great and you have to check it out. I never think of it as “that guy who used to be an actor”……may the geek gods keep smiling on you and all of of us! Happy days!….Shannon

  41. google says:
    31 March, 2004 at 4:29 pm

    Googlism for: wil wheaton
    wil wheaton is still more loved
    wil wheaton is an internet legend
    wil wheaton is still more loved a chart showing a lot of traffic on the 13th
    wil wheaton is perhaps best known for two things
    wil wheaton is the brother of actress amy wheaton
    wil wheaton is not afilliated with this page or the list in any way
    wil wheaton is not afilliated with this site in any way
    wil wheaton is in all of us
    wil wheaton is she doing hanging out with him so much
    wil wheaton is a schmuck
    wil wheaton is pretty damn cool
    wil wheaton is how i got into star trek
    wil wheaton is much cooler than wesley crusher
    wil wheaton is one incredibly cool guy
    wil wheaton is just funky cool
    wil wheaton is different for everybody
    wil wheaton is really daveadams~ posted by thebigpoop at 5
    wil wheaton is then declared the winner
    wil wheaton is getting into the weblogging thing
    wil wheaton is not like most of the rest of the actors
    wil wheaton is not affiliated with us in anyway
    wil wheaton is a vote for messing with the normals
    wil wheaton is a good addition to the staple 1337 e
    wil wheaton is a great actor
    wil wheaton is slated to make a brief appearance in the 10th trek film
    wil wheaton is one cool kid
    wil wheaton is featured in the pivotal role of gordie
    wil wheaton is best known for his roles in “stand by me” and
    wil wheaton is apparently a geek
    wil wheaton is “the white man”
    wil wheaton is an old trooper
    wil wheaton is in the movie
    wil wheaton is fine by me though
    wil wheaton is going to be in star trek x
    wil wheaton is reminding me a lot of mac
    wil wheaton is too busy beseeching
    wil wheaton is actually a pretty interesting guy
    wil wheaton is an unattractive adult
    wil wheaton is going to be 8 of 22
    wil wheaton is great as gordy
    wil wheaton is languishing in a russian gulag
    wil wheaton is lounging in an office on sunset boulevard
    wil wheaton is making a mind jump at transwarp speed here
    wil wheaton is going to be in the next tng movie
    wil wheaton is probably most famous for his role in star trek
    wil wheaton is dreamy
    wil wheaton is an ex
    wil wheaton is
    wil wheaton is not done yet
    wil wheaton is best known for “stand by me
    wil wheaton is funny
    wil wheaton is occasionally edited into these pictures
    wil wheaton is an actor
    wil wheaton is currently persueing a successful writing career in calirfornia and lives with his wife and two stepsons
    wil wheaton is best known to star trek fans as wesley crusher off of star trek
    wil wheaton is supercool? yeah
    wil wheaton is totally the bomb
    wil wheaton is currently appearing in disney’s flubber as bennett hoenicker
    wil wheaton is the man
    wil wheaton is sentenced to death
    wil wheaton is _still_ interested in coming to speak at lugod
    wil wheaton is a nerd hackers have come to respect
    wil wheaton is a nice guy
    wil wheaton is as good a star trek spokesman for linux as mandrake is a distro
    wil wheaton is cool
    wil wheaton is saying
    wil wheaton is complaining about barry making a bet against their own school
    wil wheaton is the little annoying prick who pissed off more people during the first two seasons of star trek than when that bastard
    wil wheaton is suddenly a man
    wil wheaton is up to lately
    wil wheaton is always interesting and entertaining
    wil wheaton is just goddamn awful
    wil wheaton is going to be on it
    wil wheaton is not gay
    wil wheaton is giving a speech tonight in regards to free speech & copyright

  42. rach says:
    31 March, 2004 at 5:13 pm

    hey wil,
    that was a great interview!
    just as a side note…I LOVE HOT TOPIC!!! i’m from the UK, and we don’t have them over here, i went into a couple in the states, and could have spent a FORTUNE!! teehee….but then i am huge kermit the frog fan, and they have all sorts in there! YEY!!
    anyway…i just thought i’d share that with you!
    YEY!
    take care wil,
    rach

  43. Veronica says:
    31 March, 2004 at 5:37 pm

    The interview was very good. The pictures were great. Wil always comes across so open and honest. I am turning in to a bigger and bigger fan every day.

  44. Jon says:
    31 March, 2004 at 6:10 pm

    Ok, you’re right. I’ll give you the Time Travel Feat with AC bonus. Plus at that point you’ve got all that Star Fleet Training.
    I recently watched the Season 2 DVDs so I guess I was stuck in the “Guinan, tell me about girls” version of Wesley.
    Now I’m really done. I swear. 🙂 (Ok, well, maybe there’s a 4d20+12 percent chance I’m done.)

  45. Wendi W. says:
    31 March, 2004 at 7:03 pm

    That was an awesome, awesome interview! I thoroughly enjoyed reading it. 🙂 Just one nitpick, though. It’s Nichelle, not Michelle (hey! SOMEBODY’s gotta confess to being a Trekkie Geek!). *grin* I’m sure that’s just a typo, not a mispronounciation on your part, Wil, but I just thought I’d point it out, in case it’s something easily corrected by the editors over there. 😉

  46. Tracey Weiss says:
    31 March, 2004 at 7:36 pm

    Hey Wil! The coolest thing about the interview was realizing that when you mentioned the cigars, the poker game, Hooters, I knew just what you were talking about because you’d already told me. (Well, me and tens of thousands of others.) But, it really made me feel like…well, like a friend of yours because I get to share in a small part of your life. Very cool experience! Thanks for a great weblog!
    Tracey Weiss in Santee, California

  47. museacmaker says:
    31 March, 2004 at 8:21 pm

    Great interview Wil! I didn’t see as many “like” or “umms” as some people i know(that live in the mid-west, yeah we all wanna be like cool people from california ^_^), so take heart that if you were from Ohio or Penn, etc.. it would be worse ^_^ That magizine is great too, “thanks WWdN!!!” for turning me one to it. Wil, your wildfire popularity is spreading. Congrats.

  48. Anonymous says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    I had a witty comment about your using the f-bomb. I had a comment about your being a bard, and one about wesley. They all sucked. How is it you manage to write stuff?
    Greatness. that’s how.

  49. Anonymous says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    I had a witty comment about your using the f-bomb. I had a comment about your being a bard, and one about wesley. They all sucked. How is it you manage to write stuff?
    Greatness. that’s how.

  50. Anonymous says:
    31 March, 2004 at 1:02 pm

    I had a witty comment about your using the f-bomb. I had a comment about your being a bard, and one about wesley. They all sucked. How is it you manage to write stuff?
    Greatness. that’s how.

Comments navigation

Newer comments

Comments are closed.

Search the archives

Creative Commons License

 

  • Instagram
©2025 WIL WHEATON dot NET | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes
%d