WIL WHEATON dot NET

50,000 Monkeys at 50,000 Typewriters Can't Be Wrong

to raise, perchance to fold . . .

  • Uncategorized

What a piece of work is a man! How noble in reason! how infinite in faculty! in form, in moving, how express and admirable! in action how like an angel! in apprehension how like a god! the beauty of the world! the paragon of animals! And yet, to me, what is this quintessence of dust? man delights not me; no, nor woman neither, though, by your smiling, you seem to say so. &mdash Hamlet, II.ii

Dr. Pauly and I sat beneath a cloud of smoke that had drifted from the craps table, over the velvet rope, and into the “smoke free” poker area. We drank scotch and talked about cool poker nicknames.
“I don’t have one,” I said, “really.” I folded a hand I call “Michael Jackson,” which is any Queen with a little kicker.
“They should call you ‘Hamlet,'” Pauly said. He flashed me The Hammer and raised.
“Why?” I said.
“Because your kings always get killed.”
It was folded around to him, and he folded face up.
“HAMMER!” He shouted. The locals were not amused.
We laughed and laughed, clinked our glasses, and laughed some more. Life was good, we were young, in Vegas, and kicking the shit out of the locals in the 4-8 Hold ‘Em game at the Plaza . . .

I just had my unbeaten streak of PokerStars SNGs snapped . . . when I had kings.
It went like this: Kings in middle position, with two limpers. So I raised it up to 5x the BB, and four players stayed to see the flop. I wasn’t very happy about playing my kings in a multi-way pot, until the flop came Q-6-2 rainbow. I figured one of these guys paired his queen, but figured I would have been re-raised pre-flop if any of them held QQ, so I was pretty sure I was in the lead.
An early position player made a very small bet, it was folded to me, and I popped him back about 3x. It was folded to the BB, who immediately went all-in. I figured that he didn’t have a set, and put him on AQ, or QJ. (It was very unlikely that he had KQ since I already had the other two kings, but even if he did, I was still ahead.) He had me covered, so I called for the rest of my chips . . . and I was moderately happy when he turned up QJ. “Hooray for my great read,” I thought. “Now here comes the Jack.”
Sure enough, he caught a jack on the turn.

Gordinio: shows [Qd Js] (two pair, Queens and Jacks)
Wil Wheaton: shows [Kh Ks] (a pair of Kings)
Wil Wheaton said, “doh”
Gordinio collected 2700 from pot
Wil Wheaton said, “nh”

I had a great run there for a little while, including a few times when I was way behind on the flop, and made runner-runner to suck out when I really should have lost. Meh. That’s poker.
So the bad news is that I had to put a little -22 in my log book . . . but I think the nickname is official now, and Hamlet is just about the coolest nickname I think a guy could ask for (since, you know, Jesus is taken, and all.)

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Discover more from WIL WHEATON dot NET

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

23 August, 2005 Wil

Post navigation

katrina → ← there are two colo(u)rs in my head

86 thoughts on “to raise, perchance to fold . . .”

  1. Lytspeed says:
    24 August, 2005 at 10:49 pm

    shewhobeatsass:
    No, you don’t have to pay anything to sign up with PokerStars. Keep in mind that PokerStars.com is the site that allows you to bet real money, and PokerStars.net is a play money only site. However, either site will allow free play.

  2. Craig Steffen says:
    25 August, 2005 at 8:05 am

    Ok folks:
    Wil puts this stuff up ’cause he thinks it’s cool. We read it because we think it’s (and he’s) cool. If you don’t like the poker stories, don’t read them, or just don’t read the site any more. There’s no reason whatsoever to try to tell him what to write; I’m sure there are lots of blogs out there that don’t ever talk about poker if you’d rather read them instead.
    Poker with friends/co-workers went pretty well for me when I played a couple of weeks ago. Early on, I was one of the two underdogs at the table; we had about the same amount of chips. I started with AKoff. I bet hard, only one person called me. Flop came AAx. My opponent went all-in, and I called. He had A8. I won it on the King kicker.
    After that boost, I did pretty well. The hand that fatally wounded my stack was one with the hostess; I had a good hand, but she got a straight on the river. Ah well.
    [Sorry if the poker lingo is off; I’m slowly starting to pick it up.]
    I think an organized WWDN game on one of the on-line sites would be fun.

  3. Kelmikey says:
    25 August, 2005 at 8:57 am

    ‘Hamlet’ is a famous brand of cigars in the UK, certainly a Wil thing.
    Other suggestions would be ‘The Traveller’ or maybe ‘The Gunslinger’ in recognition of, well, you can all guess what.
    First post, archives all read, work suffering!

  4. Jess says:
    25 August, 2005 at 9:21 am

    I love the poker posts! I just learned to play a few months ago , and it’s so fun ..Hamlet …good nickname

  5. CyberChas says:
    25 August, 2005 at 10:18 am

    Reddy — I owe you an apology. I sent you to Wiki because it’s SUCH a great site, but you are right, that it’s all about hypertext and you can get lost in there like a reader gets lost in a good bookstore or a histor lover gets lost in the Smithsonians.
    Here’s a better site for picking up hold em:
    http://www.flopturnriver.com/start_basics.html
    Take care,
    Charlie L
    Portland, OR
    [email protected]

  6. terrymr says:
    25 August, 2005 at 10:44 am

    I can’t imagine walking into someone else’s party and bitching them out because they didn’t have enough Guinness. Give me a break, okay?
    Poker and Guiness … sounds like a winning combination

  7. psycoma says:
    25 August, 2005 at 11:30 am

    I agree with Craig, and it has nothing to do with wanting to kiss ass or whatever just because Wil is a celebrity. All the fq famous dude /fq bullshit aside, he’s just a guy with a blog and as ‘Just A Guy With A Blog'(TM) he can write about whatever he damn well pleases. I realize that everyone has a right to their opinion but when the opinion does nothing but a)hurt someone’s feelings or b) makes you look like a prick then chances are it is one you should keep to yourself.
    On a lighter note, I played another tourney last night and came in…are you ready for it?…SECOND!! that’s right, I’m number 2!
    Oh, ok well that didn’t sound good…
    But I was though! 4th tournament and I placed 2nd out of 45. I am so into playing a WWdN tournament if one ever materializes! 😀

  8. Beekerstreet says:
    25 August, 2005 at 11:49 am

    Oh look… another poker post. They have support groups for things like this you know.
    Posted by: Nutmegger at August 23, 2005 05:51 PM
    Nutmegger: Sorry to direct this to you, but your comment is the one that broke the camel’s back. I’m getting really tired of people complaining to me about poker posts. I like poker. I like writing. I like putting those things together. If you don’t like it, nobody’s forcing you to read it. I can’t imagine walking into someone else’s party and bitching them out because they didn’t have enough Guinness. Give me a break, okay?
    Posted by: Wil at August 23, 2005 06:12 PM
    I laughed when i read this Wil – I was going to type the same thing.
    It’s just that, well, you wouldn’t want all of us to have to come over and do a poker intervetion now would ya? I KEED!

  9. hermes501 says:
    25 August, 2005 at 11:49 am

    So Hamlet,
    I’m wondering if/when you’re going to go on Celebrity Poker Showdown. Or maybe you’re not that into being on TV again… who knows? =) I’m watching the lamest episode of Celebrity Poker right now, featuring Omarosa and four people I’ve never seen in my life. A minute ago, Omarosa won with a flush, and she didn’t realize she had won (over trip 8s) until the announcer told her she had won. I think they need someone with your expertise and healthy love of the game to perk it up a bit. Just a thought. Keep having fun with the game!

  10. Wil says:
    25 August, 2005 at 11:56 am

    hermes501: A couple of years ago, TPTB from CPS told me that I “wasn’t a big enough celebrity” to play on their show . . . based on the players they’ve had since then, I don’t think I’ll ever get to play with them. 🙁
    HOWEVER: my friends at WPT told me that if they ever do more Hollwood Homegames, they’ll give me a chance to play, so I can redeem myself after my donkey-tastic episode last season.

  11. HanShotFirst says:
    25 August, 2005 at 12:10 pm

    Little on the pompous side are they not?
    Kick’m in the (_|_)!
    HSF

  12. Reddy says:
    25 August, 2005 at 12:17 pm

    Hey CyberChas
    thanks that helped – I think I’ll have play it to get it down
    now just remembering what all the terms mean when I see them – hey, I bookedmark that site so I can look up now.
    Anyone setting up a learners game??

  13. Jabbertrack says:
    25 August, 2005 at 1:29 pm

    I’m so frightened of real poker and you speaking in tounges doesn’t help Wil.
    I did win $200 on a video poker machine the other day though

  14. Nick G says:
    25 August, 2005 at 3:34 pm

    I really think that you need to take your luck over to Noble Poker this week. All month they’ve had a promo giving a million dollars to the first person who can win 7 SNG’s in a row. Very fishy over there, and they are giving away a 100% bonus. But I’m sure Pauly’s already pressed this upon you.

  15. Erbo says:
    25 August, 2005 at 10:08 pm

    Anyone who doesn’t know how to play poker, and who owns a game console (PS2, Xbox, GBA), pick up a copy of World Championship Poker. It’s inexpensive, and will give you a useful introduction to the game, though its AI is doubtful at best. The Xbox version lets you play against other people on Xbox Live. I think the PS2 version lets you play online also, and works with the EyeToy camera.
    I see that the developer is creating a sequel, World Championship Poker 2 featuring Howard Lederer. And another company is bringing out yet another console poker game, STACKED with Daniel Negreanu. And official World Series of Poker and World Poker Tour games are also forthcoming. There’ll be plenty of opportunities for console players to learn about poker without risking a dime.

  16. Joseph says:
    25 August, 2005 at 10:21 pm

    For everyone who is unfamiliar with poker, but is somewhat interested; a good book for *absolute* newbies is “The Intelligent Guide to Texas Hold’em Poker” by Sam Braids. It teaches the absolute basics, but not much more. Afterwards, some must-reads are Dan Harrington’s “Harrington on Hold’em,” Phil Hellmuth’s “Play Poker Like the Pros,” and Doyle Brunson’s “Super System.” Mike Caro’s “Book of Poker Tells” is indispensable. You all wouldn’t be here if you didn’t like to read, so dig in; Wil’s posts will be that much more meaningful. Most sites have play money options, if you’re not comfortable putting real money on the table. The interfaces differ from site to site, and I personally have found that PokerStars is the smoothest.
    Very much looking forward to the WWdN tourney. It’ll be pretty cool to have a nerd-only tournament, for once. 🙂

  17. Pooksta says:
    26 August, 2005 at 1:40 am

    Ok.. my first comment ever.. dont be a dork… dont be a dork.. umm.. Narf? Oh and Heh Hamlet sounds like a cool name only problem i have is wasn’t he poisoned in the end

  18. Spamelot says:
    26 August, 2005 at 7:18 am

    Just discovered this blog a few days ago, Thankfully! I’m a writer and a fan and have already bookmarked this page and wasted lots of time at work. I don’t play poker but I’m enjoying reading about it.

  19. DPJ2005 says:
    26 August, 2005 at 7:48 am

    When the site gets redesigned, can I suggest a new section in the FAQ for poker explaining some of the shorthand you use, Wil (I can understand about 80% of it)!
    I suspect Bravo has not contacted you for “Celebrity Poker Showdown” as that show would be the only 30 minute episode in the series, with the losers’ lounge getting full quite quickly.

  20. CyberChas says:
    26 August, 2005 at 10:08 am

    I think the poker discussions are great fun, and hearing about somebody else’s horrible poker train-wreck always makes me feel a tiny bit better about mine.
    What I love about the game of poker is that it is NOT a totally cerebral game like chess. I play chess, but the fact is, in chess, you HAVE to be either a tiny bit better or a tiny bit worse than your opponent, or it quickly stops being fun. If you are MUCH better or worse it is terribly boring for both parties. In poker, that simply isn’t true — even the dumbest fish will “draw out” (get a really lucky break that statistical odds say shouldn’t happen) on you and take your chips.
    The other thing about poker is that it is a game of more than just math and memory — it is a people game. There are moments in high-stakes poker where you are playing everything BUT your cards — you are playing your chip strength, your opponents chip strength, your position at the table, and your knowledge of the other players personalities and patterns of play, and only looking at your cards so that they THINK you are playing your cards. There is really no other game with so many different facets.
    Plus, as they say about No-limit Texas Hold’em, it’s like hunting, where your prey can suddenly start shooting back.
    Charlie L
    Portland, OR
    [email protected]
    Played last night in a 33 person tournament and came in 3rd. Had a shot at 1st but badly mis-played A-9s. Learned new things to improve my game, though.

  21. DCfreakingM says:
    26 August, 2005 at 10:16 am

    Actually, wouldn’t “Denmark” be more appropriate than Hamlet?

  22. Kudra says:
    26 August, 2005 at 12:16 pm

    Am I the only one who went to the wikipedia site and saw there was a Klingon translation of hamlet? THought it was funny
    By the way as to the debate oabout poker, I admit that I was thrown off by the sudden explosion of nothing but poker talk and actually hadn’t been checking in her as much. But strangly I had a dream that I randomly met Wil and didn’t have anything to say to him cause I hadn’t been keeping up. What I’m trying to say is, what everyone else has been. We can’t decide what he blogs about cause he blogs about what he wants to. Just keep an eye out for the stuff your interested in and ignore the stuff you don’t want to hear about..
    And after all you should have brought your own guiness if that’s what you wanted… or somthing like that.

  23. codepoet80 says:
    26 August, 2005 at 12:49 pm

    sorry, i know this is Wil’s site and he can post about whatever the heck he wants. but since it seems to be an actual debate now, i figured i’d sign up and post my two cents…
    i tend to agree with the anti-poker folks. not because i think wil shouldn’t post whatever he wants, just that it’s boring and doesn’t make any sense. i tried following some of those links to understanding poker lingo, but i really have no interest in learning all those terms.
    i guess maybe my point is, even though i’m not an actor or an author or a step-dad, or a D&D player, i could relate to all those things because of the accesible way that Wil wrote about them. wil, you made those things applicable and understandable. poker… not so much.
    really glad you’ve found something you enjoy and are so successful at it. but i’ve found that it’s more difficult to read your site or relate to you since you got really into poker. not that that has to be the point of your site — it is, like i said, yours. just some feedback, is all.

  24. shewhobeatsass says:
    26 August, 2005 at 2:25 pm

    thanks Lytspeed…i appreciate it.

  25. Kukailimoku says:
    26 August, 2005 at 2:38 pm

    So, Wil…
    If your pocket kings were heads up against Phil Ivey’s AQ, would you BOTH lose?!?
    😀
    Keep the poker talk coming. Your fellow people-in-need-of-support-groups are enjoying it.
    Aloha

  26. TimCalif says:
    26 August, 2005 at 8:19 pm

    “donkey-tastic” ? Can I use that word? It cracked me up!!!
    Tim in NorCal

  27. Troy Rutter says:
    26 August, 2005 at 8:43 pm

    Hamlet? I like it.
    I think I coined one on pokerstars.com tonight. I call it the “Van Patten” – it is when a pair of 8’s are enough to win (Eight is Enough) The rest of the room wasn’t as amused as I was.

  28. Jim Cowling says:
    26 August, 2005 at 9:06 pm

    Huh. I was playing a $20+2 tournament this evening. My dad phoned while I was holding cowboys, and they didn’t hold up against A-K offsuit. Had I been paying attention, I might not have lost the hand, but I might have anyway. Maybe I can take Lannister as my nickname….
    I was close to the money, too, and my stake was over median. Piss me off.
    And for my two cents, I’d be happy to see the blog go “nothing but poker”.

  29. kat says:
    27 August, 2005 at 9:04 am

    I’m sooo tired of reading about poker. It makes me sad. I used to read here everyday. Now I click on your link and think to myself – Why? It’s just going to be a bunch of stuff I don’t understand or care to spend the time on. I love your writing, Wil. I just don’t care for so much emphasis on this game. I keep coming back to check, but less frequently.

  30. doctorlegg says:
    27 August, 2005 at 10:45 am

    Personally, as someone who also plays poker, I really enjoy the poker posts. However that doesn’t seem to be that relevant here as a lot of folk appear to be missing the point.
    Wil has a blog, in which he writes about his life right? Poker, at the moment (and probably in the future with his link up with Pokerstars), is a big part of his life so he is bound to write about it here. The man was playing in the World Series of Poker in Vegas last month! Would you have prefered not to hear about it?!
    I’m sure Wil will continue to blog about all the areas that all the poker-blog-naysayers prefer to read about, but give the guy a break and let him write about things that are playing a big part in his life at the moment. Isn’t that why we all starting reading his site in the first place?
    Just my 2c.
    Cheers,
    D.

  31. Jonpaul says:
    27 August, 2005 at 11:56 am

    Wil, what can I say when your right your right. I apologize and prostrate myself before thee oh Hamlet.

  32. Andrew says:
    27 August, 2005 at 4:26 pm

    Doctorlegg: You wrote, “Would you have prefered not to hear about it?!”
    The answer is yes, they would prefer not to hear about things that don’t interest them. The people who go to the trouble of commenting on Wil’s site to say that the topics which interest him are not suitable for him to discuss display breathtaking arrogance … alas, of a type I’ve grown very used to seeing online.
    Folks, no one is saying you have to like all of Wil’s posts, but it’s rude to come to his site and tell him that his deep interests are boring. There are thousands of blogs out there which don’t ever mention poker; perhaps you’d be happier reading one of those.

  33. Adri says:
    27 August, 2005 at 4:27 pm

    This is off topic but I thought you’d like to know that the Philadelphia Inquirer mentioned you.

  34. J.M. Lankenau says:
    27 August, 2005 at 4:43 pm

    Hey, Wil – just watched your book reading of “Just a Geek”. Nice work. I gotta tell you though; the part where Frakes tells Dorn “Bill Shatner just shit all over Teen Idol over there…” That’s funny as hell. You’re lucky to have had the chance to work with that group; I could not imagine life without humor. It would be amazingly dull. And insulting, considering the things we say to our friends and loved ones solely in jest. Damn, that would suck; my marriage would be over. Thanks for posting that so we could watch it. You are the i-ching.

  35. Jeannette311 says:
    27 August, 2005 at 6:37 pm

    Wil~
    Haha, am I a total dork for remembering the site’s birthday? *blushes*
    I can’t believe I’ve been reading your blog for almost 4 years….
    Sure, I know nothing of POker, but I’ve watched it on TV when you’re on, and TRY to understand what you’re talking about… =D
    No matter what, your blog still entertains (and even educates) me, and is the only one I faithfully read.
    Here’s to many more years of WilWheaton.net!
    Jeannette
    PS I think I have some poker chips around here somewhere that you can have to decorate your cake! ;D

  36. Rook says:
    27 August, 2005 at 6:45 pm

    Such language! It’s like some alien form of communication.
    That is why I never get poker…..

Comment navigation

← Older Comments

Comments are closed.

Related Posts

The conclusion of Tabletop’s Fiasco

Part one of Saturday Night 78 ended with quite a cliffhanger... ...so here's part two!

A troubling realization

This comes to us from my son, Ryan Wheaton.

Good News, Bad News

I got an amazing job that conflicts with the Denver Comicon next month, so I can't attend the convention.

I am easily amused

Hooray for stupid jokes! *fart*

Recent Posts

catching halos on the moon

catching halos on the moon

I had such a good time with my garden last season. It was the first time I had ever capital-t Tended a garden in my life, and it was a […]

More Info
in the heat of the summer better call out a plumber

in the heat of the summer better call out a plumber

Back in the old days, the good old days, when it was generally accepted that Fascism and Nazis were bad, bloggers would write these posts that were sort of recaps […]

More Info
lift every voice and sing

lift every voice and sing

Lift every voice and sing,‘Til earth and heaven ring,Ring with the harmonies of Liberty;Let our rejoicing riseHigh as the listening skies,Let it resound loud as the rolling sea.Sing a song [...]

More Info
it picks me up, puts me down

it picks me up, puts me down

I’ve been open and unashamed about my mental health struggles and triumphs, always willing to talk about my CPTSD, always willing to supportively listen when someone chooses to share their [...]

More Info

 

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Member of The Internet Defense League

Creative Commons License
WIL WHEATON dot NET by Wil Wheaton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://wilwheaton.net.

Search my blog

Powered by WordPress | theme SG Double
%d