WIL WHEATON dot NET

50,000 Monkeys at 50,000 Typewriters Can't Be Wrong

The Thing is really great, is not about Ben Grimm

  • Film

Anne and I saw The Thing last night. tl;dr: I thought it was great.

It's a prequel to the 1982 John Carpenter movie, which is one of my favorite movies of all time, and easily the best Sci-Fi/Horror film ever made. Normally, I would flat out refuse to see it, because I thought it was a remake/reboot, and I'm sick to death of those things. However, I'd heard that they gotten a lot of the practical effects guys together for it, and that was intriguing to me. When a bunch of friends were getting together to see it last night, that was all I needed to go ahead and give it a chance.

So, full disclosure: it turns out that my friend Eric wrote it. How I didn't remember this until I saw his name in the credits is a mystery, especially considering that the whole reason we all got together last night was specifically to watch it with him.

(This is what happens when I have Writer's Brain, and all I can think about is the story I'm working on. My mental CPU is usually at 180% and there's no virtual memory available for other tasks.)

Anyway, I really liked the movie. It's a prequel to the 1982 film, and it tells the story of the discovery of The Thing by the Norwegians, and what it does to them. It's scary, it's gory, and it does an absolutely fantastic job of respecting Carpenter's film, both in tone and story.

My only complaint is that one of the actors makes a really bad choice to play essentially the same note through the whole movie, which robs his character of what could have been a very satisfying arc.

When I mentioned on Twitter last night that I gave it 4.5/5 (the .5 being taken away for the aforementioned complaint), a bunch of people replied to me with various versions of "I hated it and you're stupid for liking it," which sort of baffles me. Now, as an unabashed fan of the 1982 film, maybe I have a connection to the story and the mythos that the average 20-something doesn't, but I don't think you need to be a fan of Carpenter's movie to enjoy this one.

  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • More
  • Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window) Pinterest

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related


Discover more from WIL WHEATON dot NET

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

17 October, 2011 Wil

Post navigation

Flash Fiction: The Monster In My Closet → ← I am literally playing The Dead Meemaw Card so that you’ll watch me on The Big Bang Theory tonight.

39 thoughts on “The Thing is really great, is not about Ben Grimm”

  1. twitter.com/Rathwirt says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:43 am

    Your article makes it sound like you are surprised that people have different opinions on movies, Wil! 🙂
    The hate for liking something is just too common everywhere though, which is sad.

  2. Eric Stirpe says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:45 am

    Sadly, haters gonna hate… I feel like the haters are being particularly loud against this one; not sure why. I’ve always trusted your opinion on media, so I think I might ignore the critics and go check this one out now!
    (I’ve also never seen the original Thing and now have plans to Netflix it tonight because of your endorsement… so go ahead and put two points in your Victory Book for the day. :P)

  3. Nulautre says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:46 am

    Although i have not seen the movie yet, I MUST correct one glaring error… “Alien” is the best Sci-Fi/Horror movie of all time… (though the Thing is a very close second on my list)

  4. ElevenPointTwo says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:46 am

    I loved Carpenter’s The Thing, and can’t wait to see the Prequel… but how can you use the word “easily” to describe Carpenter’s film as the best SciFi/Horror film ever? Surely, you agonized a bit over Alien?

  5. Nosmorex.wordpress.com says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:47 am

    I had not planned on seeing this, as I too am a fan of the Carpenter version. My wife and I will find a night this week to see it.
    My father maintains the “original” from 1951 as one of the scariest movies he has ever seen.

  6. Wil says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:48 am

    Hmmm…. you may be right, and now I have forced myself into a box where I have to justify my statement, even if I now doubt it.
    TO THE DEBATE CLUB!

  7. AbelUndercity says:
    17 October, 2011 at 10:49 am

    I’ll admit I had low expectations after seeing the ads, but this gives me some hope.
    That said, I’d love a Ben Grimm movie.

  8. Matthew Cherry says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:03 am

    I liked the prequel, and I think it would be an awesome movie for anyone who can accept it for what it is–a movie from a different age. Personally, I prefer the psychological horror of the first over the BOO! horror that is popular now, and nothing can top Rob Bottin’s Things, but they did a nice job.
    The only thing that really bothered me was the suicide homage. That seemed really forced while the others worked so well.
    Also, on a different note, it’s easy how to rank The Thing and Alien: The Thing is the best Sci-Fi/Horror movie set on Earth, Alien the best set in space/on another planet. Everyone’s happy!

  9. ElevenPointTwo says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:03 am

    easily the best Sci-Fi/Horror film ever made… involving a sled dog?

  10. Matthew Cherry says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:04 am

    Sorry if that seems discombobulated, but it can be hard to be coherent with a eight-month-old fighting sleep on your chest. lol

  11. Chris Smith says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:04 am

    I’ll have to agree with Nulature that it goes to Alien…RE: Debate club. Especially because the entire plot line of Alien (not the sequels) is that the alien is just trying to take a nap and people keep disturbing it. Why can’t a creature get some sleep?

  12. KeithAllGamer says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:17 am

    I saw the prequel on Friday and watched the Carpenter version again last night. I have mixed feelings about the new version. I tried to like it as much as I could, but I see some problems. Will try not to spoil anything here (I assume anyone reading these comments are at least passingly familiar with the Carpenter version or Campbell’s “Who Goes There?”).
    Can’t really tell how people are being “infected” off camera. In the Carpenter version, you see the dog creature go into one of the character’s rooms, which must be when/how he and one of the other revealed converted characters got taken over. You see blood in a shower, but this is after the primary creature has been dealt with in the new version. Could be the dog creature that we only see at the very end when it’s headed for the American camp, but there is no sign of it before then. Makes for more of a told not shown sort of situation.
    One of the characters gets converted without any damage or staining of his clothes (and he is somewhere he didn’t have a change of clothes). Plot issues like this hurt the movie some for me.
    I did like the effects, but nothing made my jaw drop like the scenes in the middle of the Carpenter movie with the chest and head (maybe I’m just a bit jaded from having seen so many sci-fi movies now). Didn’t notice the acting problem Wil did, and I liked Winstead’s smart and brave Kate Lloyd character (though think she should have been lunch at that one scene, creature should have taken her the way Blair deals with Garry in the Carpenter version, but instead it takes the time to show off; guess it was doing the alien version of monologuing).
    There are some nice overlapping scenes if you go back and rewatch the Carpenter version afterwards, like the bloody ax in the wall and the two-headed alien corpse.
    I thought the new version was entertaining enough, but that it could have been better with a few tweaks here and there.

  13. Tim Lavalli says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:22 am

    I gotta go with the 1955 version. Scared the hell out of me when I saw it on tv. When they open that door and the creature is right there… No it doesn’t hold up but just knowing it was Marshall Matt Dillon in the Thing costume added another level of otherworldliness. Will see the new version based solely on the Wil recommendation.

  14. Tfez66 says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:23 am

    This is one of my favorite posts you’ve written. Between the joke in the title, comparing your brain to a computer, and the “to the debate club!” comment, I am laughing / nodding in agreement enough that my cubicle neighbor became concerned that I was having some manner of fit. Can’t tell you how much I needed that today, thank you!

  15. Alan Cedeno says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:38 am

    Sound like a great movie. Norwegians getting killed by a “thing”, being bombarded by terrorist, and now taking away the North Dakota oil…. They are roaring for sure in this movie!! God dammit!

  16. Melissa Bramble says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:46 am

    Not about the movie specifically, but about Eric Heisserer, your friend who wrote it (right?): I really dig his short stories. I read his fourth one on Mulholland Books’ Popcorn Fiction today, and it’s REALLY interesting. I think I still may like “Last Vegas” better, but all of his stuff on there is worth checking out. Actually, most of the stuff on that site is worth checking out, and I would strongly encourage any WWDN:IX readers to head on over there. (Note: I am not affiliated with that site or Mulholland Books in any way. I started reading Drew McWeeney’s stories over there and got hooked by all the awesome content.)

  17. twitter.com/Lovellama says:
    17 October, 2011 at 12:04 pm

    Carpenter’s The Thing is fabulous. I love it. The comment Palmer makes when he sees the head? My favorite part. I was leery of seeing the prequel, as yours is the first positive review I’ve found. Perhaps on DVD…

  18. Barghest1031 says:
    17 October, 2011 at 12:18 pm

    I feel no shame in admitting that I’m going to use this post to argue to my boyfriend that he needs to see this movie with me. XD I’ve loved John Carpenter’s “The Thing” since I was a kid, and I’ve been wanting to see this prequel since I found out about it being made. Quite a few of my friend’s have liked it, as well, so now I’m really looking forward to seeing it.

  19. A Facebook User says:
    17 October, 2011 at 12:41 pm

    For a Thing POV of the first movie check out the Peter Watts short story:
    http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/

  20. Chris Weiss says:
    17 October, 2011 at 1:06 pm

    I’d be curious to know how close the film stuck to the original script. There were a few bits in there where I really felt like “There’s something important on the editing room floor”. Particularly the suicide of the radio man(?). We’ll have to wait for the mega phat DVD version.
    I gotta admit, the original is certainly in my top 5 horror flicks (and still has *the* best jump-outta-the-seat moment when the Thing passes through that dark hallway).

  21. Ian says:
    17 October, 2011 at 1:08 pm

    I saw the original in the theatre all those years ago… scared the crap outta my sorry teenage butt back then. I guess I will have to go check it out.

  22. Wil says:
    17 October, 2011 at 1:47 pm

    Oh!! I got it: The Thing is the greatest Sci-Fi/Horror, and Alien is the best Horror/Sci-Fi.
    THAT, my friends, is how it's done.

  23. Wil says:
    17 October, 2011 at 1:51 pm

    I remember when Scalzi linked this awhile back, and I'm glad you mentioned it. It's a great read.

  24. karohemd says:
    17 October, 2011 at 2:01 pm

    As I’m a huge fan of the original as well, I’m glad you think the prequel is great (the trailer looked good) so I’m definitely going to go and see it.
    Three years ago I had the pleasure of seeing the original in glorious 70mm on a big screen during a fantastic films festival. It really was fantastic. The year after they showed Aliens in 70mm and I hope they will finally show The Wrath of Khan next year.

  25. Matthew Cherry says:
    17 October, 2011 at 2:08 pm

    That’s even better than I was thinking…which is why you make the big bucks, and I’m just a schmuck on the Internet. lol

  26. Matthew Cherry says:
    17 October, 2011 at 2:32 pm

    Come to think on it, wouldn’t The Thing do better as the better Horror/Sci-Fi? It has less sci-fi elements than Alien, after all, and could just as easily not involve sci-fi at all and be just as horrifying.
    The fact that the Thing is an alien is really just a convenient tool for the plot–it could just as easily be an ancient being and work. Part o what makes Alien work is the close confines of a spaceship.
    Then again, either story would work in either scenery…I feel a story coming on. To the writing station!

  27. ChuckEmoryJr says:
    17 October, 2011 at 3:14 pm

    It good to hear that you liked it. I liked the first one as well and I was worried that it would fall into the dreaded prequel/sequel abyss. I’m glad they stuck with the Norwegian angle. Can’t wait to see it.

  28. Stickmann says:
    17 October, 2011 at 3:15 pm

    If you’re in the area, please come to Halloween Horror Nights at Universal Studios Hollywood ( http://www.halloweenhorrornights.com/hollywood/2011/ )! I’m working the maze for “The Thing” there, and I can testify firsthand that the creature effects hold up even under bright light, even though there’s atmospheric low-light conditions in the walkthrough. They actually did pull molds off of the movie’s practical effects sculptures for this event, so that’s just one more element that makes the venue special.

  29. ElevenPointTwo says:
    17 October, 2011 at 3:19 pm

    “Original”
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
    The 1951 film The Thing From Another World is the original (the one with James Arness as the alien mentioned earlier in the comment thread), based John W. Campbell’s _Who Goes There?_ from 1938.

  30. Wil says:
    17 October, 2011 at 3:32 pm

    Yeah, I know. I say "original" because I saw John Carpenter's The Thing in 1982 when I was 10, so — to me and many in my generation — it *is* the original.

  31. Iswpw says:
    17 October, 2011 at 3:49 pm

    Just to pop a few more cogs on the whole “original” thing (no pun intended), the original film was based on a lousy/mediocre/good/excellent (take your pick) novella titled “Who Goes There?” written by John W. Campbell, the famed editor of Astounding Science Fiction (later Analog Science Fiction and Fact).
    You can read it online here: http://nzr.mvnu.edu/faculty/trearick/english/rearick/readings/manuscri/Who%20Goes%20There/Who%20Goes%20There%20Index.htm. It’s a lousy/mediocre/good/excellent (take your pick) read.
    Ken

  32. PdxNat says:
    17 October, 2011 at 4:20 pm

    The ever lovin’ blue eyed Thing heads to the arctic where he’s plagued by murderous practical-jokers from the planet Yancy Street. Now that’s a movie!

  33. JasonMaggini says:
    17 October, 2011 at 5:50 pm

    I ran into an unhealthy dose of that “it’s popular so I hate it and you’re an idiot for liking it” crap over on Reddit the other day. It was in a thread about The Big Bang Theory (and on the Star Trek subreddit, of all places).
    I couldn’t help but hear several of the more haughty posts in Sheldon’s voice.

  34. Wil says:
    17 October, 2011 at 5:59 pm

    Isn't it funny how Sheldon's voice has replaced The Comic Book Guy's voice?

  35. Grit Springer says:
    17 October, 2011 at 11:43 pm

    I must also agree with Nulaure…can’t beat the Alien movie. But I guess now I will have to watch The Thing to see how the movie turned out.
    In general I don’t go with what other people think of a movie, even though I always keep asking “hey, how was that movie?” because often enough, I end up liking movies, the majority loves to hate and the other way around. But I guess that’s the good thing about being mature enough to respect other people’s opinions without forcing their own upon them.

  36. LinksMonkey says:
    18 October, 2011 at 9:22 am



    – The Thing: The Musical

  37. Ddiamond0 says:
    18 October, 2011 at 9:43 am

    The 1982 Thing has an insane Wilfred Brimley. That puts it at the top of my list. (it really wasn’t paranoia btw, just months and months of Quaker oatmeal)

  38. ElevenPointTwo says:
    18 October, 2011 at 10:43 am

    Wil, I should have been more explicit: I was addressing the many commenters in the thread, not you… you actually didn’t use the word at all in your post!

  39. Alan says:
    20 October, 2011 at 12:47 am

    I think you might have posted this a while back, but it seems appropriate at this juncture.
    A short story told from the perspective of The Thing: http://clarkesworldmagazine.com/watts_01_10/

Comments are closed.

Related Posts

buy the ticket, take your turn

It's another one of those round up posts, like in the Before Times!

all the small things

Back in the old days, we'd do these posts that collected a bunch of stuff that didn't fit anywhere else. This is one of those.

in which i discover analog horror

When I was a kid, I was obsessed with the paranormal and the occult. I did not believe any of it was real, but I still loved it. I loved […]

The Backrooms and Night Mind

A few months ago, I started watching YouTube channels every night before bed. Mostly, it’s been explorations of abandoned places, histories of video games and 80s pop culture, and all […]

Recent Posts

hey it’s me on the katee sackhoff podcast!

hey it’s me on the katee sackhoff podcast!

I recorded this episode of the Katee Sackhoff Podcast a couple of weeks ago. It’s when I realized I needed to spend some money on a camera and some lights, […]

More Info
it’s storytime with wil wheaton episode 7 – end of play by chelsea sutton

it’s storytime with wil wheaton episode 7 – end of play by chelsea sutton

Well, here we are in Spain. I feel like I am just getting started, and I wish I had more new episodes yet to come, but we have come to […]

More Info
it’s storytime with wil wheaton episode 6 – if we make it through this alive by a.t. greenblatt

it’s storytime with wil wheaton episode 6 – if we make it through this alive by a.t. greenblatt

Happy Wednesday, friends! I'm here to remind you that there's a new episode of It's Storytime with Wil Wheaton, waiting for you wherever you get your podcasts.

More Info
good news, everyone!

good news, everyone!

Whoops. I misread my calendar, and this week’s It’s Storytime with Wil Wheaton is not the final episode. And it is not the episode I teased in the blog post […]

More Info

 

  • Instagram
  • Facebook

Member of The Internet Defense League

Creative Commons License
WIL WHEATON dot NET by Wil Wheaton is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at http://wilwheaton.net.

Search my blog

Powered by WordPress | theme SG Double
%d