I hate unsolicited e-mail, of any kind. Period. I don’t care about whatever alleged virus warning you heard about from your aunt’s neighbor’s secretary, or the kid who just wants to get ten thousand e-mails before he dies from cancer. And I’ve already collected my $5000 from Walt Disney, Jr. and Bill Gates, thank you.
I’m also not very impressed with the Mainstream Corporate Media, who are thoroughly obsessed with that fucking Runaway Bride, or the incredibly stupid Michael Jackson trial, but can’t seem to find space or time to cover the Downing Street Memo and ignore the whole Jeff Gannon / James Guckert story. Why do you think so many Americans are turning to the BBC or Guardian UK for news about our country? It’s not because we hope to catch the latest cricket scores between stories; it’s because the Mainstream Corporate Media in America is a miserable failure.
Sorry you had to endure that rant. It’s important for context, because these two things that I can’t stand intersected tonight, when I got spammed by the Wall Street Journal with a “Dear Blogger:” letter.
Dear Blogger:
Check out today’s free features from The Wall Street Journal:
A buyer’s guide to the next-generation of videogame consoles.
[link removed – no google ranking for you!]
More companies are monitoring their workers’ online activities. But not very many monitor the boss’s.
[link removed – no google ranking for you!]
Plus, WSJ.com now offers an RSS feed of our free content with a 30-day archive:
http://online.wsj.com/xml/rss/0,,3_7077,00.xml
[Okay, this is actually good. On the same day the NYT decided to move even more content behind the stupid wall of subscription, it’s nice to see that at least one member of the Mainstream Corporate Media understands that RSS is cool, and a 30 day archive isn’t the best thing, but it’s a step in the right direction.]
All of WSJ.com’s free content can be found at [link removed – no google ranking for you!]
And please feel free to email me if you’d rather not receive these emails; if you’d prefer to receive them at a different email address; if this particular email is off-topic; or if you have any comments or requests about WSJ.com’s free content.
Oh? Can I please? Okay. Let’s try this:
Dear Corporate Media Spammer:
Checkout how lame it is tosend form letters tospam bloggers with your crap!
Checkout all the free content that’s already on the Internet — and let me clue you in on a big secret: if it’s newsworthy, we’ll find it. Spamming us with “Dear Blogger:” e-mails is not the best way to spread the word about your fabulous free content.
Did you know that there are already sources of tech news that respect our intelligence? Take a look at Wired Technology News or Arstechnica.com. They get read and linked because they don’t spam us.
Did you know there are news sources who actually report the news, rather than repeat whatever the popular media narrative or White House Talking Point is? Check out Knight Ridder or Consortium News!
And as long as I have your attention, (especially you talking heads on cable news) please realize that you’re not part of the problem, you are the problem. If you think I’m wrong, I have two words for you: Terri. Schiavo.
And please feel free to email me if you ever decide to get some spine when you report on Dear Leader; if you’d prefer to cover stories that actually make a difference in the world, like sending over 1500 Americans to die for a lie, instead of still more in-depth coverage of the aftermath of the Scott Peterson trial; if you care to explain why you think spamming bloggers is a really smart thing to do; or if you have any comments or requests about why we should pay attention to you at all.
See, if the Mainstream Corporate Media ever mentions blogs or bloggers, it’s to either 1) suck up to the douchebags idiots liars at Powerline, or 2) pointedly declare that blogs and bloggers are so irrelevant. So why does The Wall Street Journal think it’s a great idea to spam us?
This is an incredibly stupid move. I don’t know anyone, blogger or otherwise, who enjoys spam. I can’t think of a single person who is going to respond favorably to this ill-advised tactic.
I received two different e-mails like this from the Wall Street Journal, seconds apart. I immediately replied, and asked to be removed from the list. To their credit, while I was composing this entry, I was informed that I was removed, with brief apology.
So after they did the stupid thing, they did the right thing. Personally, I think the best thing to do would have been to not spam us at all. The smarter thing (that would have at least shown a little understanding of the medium they’re hoping to infiltrate) may have been to send an e-mail that said something like,
We’d like to reach out to bloggers, and make weblog readers aware of our free content. If you’d like to help us, reply to this e-mail, and we’ll tell you how to get set up. If you’re not interested, please accept our apologies. This will be the only e-mail you ever get from us.
I’m sure I’m not the only person who got a “Dear Blogger:” e-mail from the WSJ, and I’m interested to see how other bloggers react.